SAUL ESLAKE

Economist

SAUL ESLAKE

‘Welcome to my website …
I’m an independent economist, speaker, company director
and Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow at the University of Tasmania’

The Economic Consequences of Mr Trump Article


Publications, The Global Economy | 26th October 2016

Saul Eslake | The Conversation | 26th October 2016

The (possible) economic consequences of Mr Trump
Original text of an article published (after some editing) on
The Conversation, 26th October 2016.

Opinion polls, statistical prediction models and betting markets are now all predicting a fairly comfortable victory for Hillary Clinton in next month’s US Presidential election. However, similar auguries were held for the prospect of British voters opting to remain in the EU ahead of the ‘Brexit’ referendum in June. In that instance, those wanting ‘change’ (which in the context of this US Presidential election seems to be associated with supporting Donald Trump) felt much more strongly about it, and were thus more inclined to vote, than those favouring the ‘status quo’ (as represented in the US elections by Hillary Clinton).

So the possibility of a Trump victory can’t be entirely dismissed – and the possible consequences of such an outcome remain worth considering.

Precisely because a triumph for Trump has by now been so widely discounted – including by the financial markets – such an outcome would prompt a much larger financial market reaction than a Clinton victory.

The unexpected outcome of the ‘Brexit’ referendum saw the London share market fall by more than 5%, and the British pound by more than 8%, in the following 24 hours: and although the share market has since more than recouped its initial losses, the pound is now almost 18% below its pre-referendum level against the US dollar.

The financial market reaction to a Trump victory in the US Presidential race is likely to be sharper: as RBA Governor Philip Lowe noted earlier this month, “the possible election of President Trump wouldn’t be as benign an event” as ‘Brexit’ turned out to be.

A paper published this week by Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz (of the University of Michigan and Dartmouth College, respectively) suggests that the US, UK and Asian share markets could fall by 10-15%, and that the Mexican peso would fall by 25%, in the event of a Trump victory.

From an historical perspective this is an extraordinary prospect, given that, as Wolfers and Zitzewitz note, “in almost every case back to 1880, equity markets have risen on the news that Republicans win elections and fall when Democrats win”, and that, at least superficially, Donald Trump is proposing policies which are more likely to benefit rich households (who are more likely to own equities) while Hillary Clinton is explicitly advocating higher taxes on capital.

Such findings are however more understandable in the light of mainstream economists’ assessments of the likely implications of the alternative policy proposals put forward by the two main contenders.  Out of 414 respondents to a survey conducted by the US National Association of Business Economists, 55% thought that Hillary Clinton would “do the best job as president of managing the economy”. By contrast, only 14% thought that Donald Trump would “do the best job” (and that was 1 percentage point less than the proportion who nominated Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson) – and it’s perhaps worth emphasizing that this was a survey of business, not academic, economists.

This overwhelming view likely reflects three particularly important concerns – to mainstream economists – about the Republican Presidential candidate’s policies.

First, Donald Trump’s policies would significantly increase the US Budget deficit.

The bipartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) last month estimated that the combination of tax cuts and spending increases proposed by Donald Trump would add US$5.3 trillion to US public debt over the next decade, lifting it from 77% to 105% of GDP; whereas the spending and tax measures (cuts for some, increases for others) proposed by Hillary Clinton would boost public debt by ‘only’ US$200 billion, to 86% of GDP, over the next decade. A more recent analysis  of Donald Trump’s tax proposals by the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution’s Tax Policy Center suggests that they would increase US Federal debt by US$7.2 trillion over a decade.

While both candidates assert that their policy proposals would boost economic growth, which would in turn result in lower (rather than higher) budget deficits, the CRFB calculates that economic growth would need to average 3.5% pa over the next decade (in the face of an ageing population and, under Donald Trump’s proposals, lower rates of immigration) in order to stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio without further tax increases – something which would “likely require a level of productivity growth that has not been achieved in any decade in modern history” according to the CRFB – whereas the same objective would require economic growth averaging 2.7% pa under Hillary Clinton’s proposals.

Second, Donald Trump has consistently advocated a major upheaval in US trade policies, including the repudiation of the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the designation of China as a ‘currency manipulator’, something which under existing US trade laws would allow the imposition of tariffs of up to 45% on goods imported into the US from China. While the greatest adverse impact of such measures would be on low-income households in the US itself (as the result of having to pay much higher prices for goods which make up a large proportion of their spending), there would also be an obvious negative impact on the Chinese economy – since China’s exports to the US account for 18% of its total exports, and just under 4% of China’s GDP.

Additionally, it’s hard to imagine that China wouldn’t seek to retaliate in some way against any such measures by a Trump Administration. In a study published by the Petersen Institute, Marcus Nolan, Sherman Robinson and Tyler Moran suggest that in such circumstances, the US economy would experience a recession in 2018 and 2019, with unemployment rising to 8.6%.

It’s hard to imagine how a ‘trade war’ between the world’s two largest economies, between Australia’s largest and third-largest trading partners, could have anything other than negative consequences for Australia.

The third concern for mainstream economists arising from Donald Trump’s economic agenda is his contempt for the independence of the US Federal Reserve. While Trump’s suggestion that the Fed should have been more willing to raise US interest rates this year is not without some merit, his personal criticisms of Fed Chair Janet Yellen combined with the fact that there are already two unfilled vacancies on the Fed’s Board of Governors suggests that the Fed could quickly become much more politicized in the event of a Trump victory. That would likely undermine confidence in US monetary policy, potentially leading in turn to a weaker US dollar and higher US bond yields.

Beyond these concerns to mainstream economists, the Republican candidate’s attitude towards long-standing US alliances  – with European countries, Japan and Korea – threatens to create much greater political uncertainty around the world, and may even prompt an ‘arms race’ entailing greater proliferation of nuclear weapons. Donald Trump hasn’t specifically listed Australia as being among the US allies who “aren’t paying anywhere near what it costs to defend them”, and it could be that Australia’s status as one of the few countries with which the US runs a trade surplus puts us in a different category. Nonetheless, a deteriorating regional security environment could result in the Australian Government concluding that it needed to spend more on defence.

It’s important to note that not all of the foregoing concerns will be completely alleviated should, as seems more likely, Hillary Clinton becomes the 45th President of the United States. Should that result be accompanied by a ‘clean sweep’ of both the Senate and (less likely) the House of Representatives, left-wing Democrats such as Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders will have a much larger influence on US economic policy. The differences between Donald Trump and the left wing of the Democratic Party on trade policy, or on the independence of the Fed, are in reality quite small.

So while a Clinton victory on 8th November is much the better outcome from an Australian perspective, it would not be in Australia’s interests for her to win too well.

WEEKLY CHART PACK


Each weekend since mid-April 2020 I’ve been preparing, updating and distributing a weekly Coronavirus Impact Chart Pack to people in Australia and overseas. Running to over 100 pages it includes:

  • charts tracking the spread of Covid-19, globally and in Australia, and government responses to it;
  • the impact on the global economy and major individual economies such as China, Japan, other Asian economies, the US and Europe;
  • financial and commodities markets;
  • multiple aspects of the Australian economy, including state-level comparisons, and the policy responses of the Australian and state or territory governments, and the Reserve Bank of Australia; and
  • similar, though smaller coverage of the New Zealand economy.

The Coronavirus Impact Chart Pack will be updated every Saturday afternoon, Australian time, for as long as it remains topical. It will be accessible to subscribers of the Premium Access package.

If and when Covid-19 ceases to be front and centre of attention (as it is now) – whenever that might be – I will continue to prepare a Weekly Chart Pack, but with a focus on whatever replaces the virus as the issue du jour.

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC
23rd October 2021


CORONAVIRUS IMPACT CHART PACK 2021-10-23

"I see a lot of chart packs in my line of work, but yours is about the best I have seen. It is amazingly comprehensive, covering far more of the world than any individual is entitled to cover, the charts are clear and easy to understand and they drill down into each topic in a very satisfying way. So well done, Saul."

Alan Kohler, ABC finance presenter, founder of Eureka Report


"A timely and comprehensive summary from one of Australia's best economists."

Adam Creighton, Economics Editor for The Australian


“I continue to find your thinking invaluable - this year to my ritual weekend reading of the economist I have happily added ‘Saul’s latest’.”

Rufus Black, former Managing Partner of McKinsey’s, and currently Vice-Chancellor of the University of Tasmania


“Your chart pack is amazing - and thanks for offering to add me to the mailing list, that would be great to be included. Everything you could want to know is there - and the way the data are organised and presented to tell the stories makes it so easy to follow.”

Prof Jeff Borland, Truby Williams Professor of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Website


“An excellent summary. Although I take a great interest in what’s happening with COVID-19 day by day In Australia and Internationally, I always find your weekly summary a very interesting review of the past week.”

retired former Chief Executive Officer of a District Hospital Service in New South Wales


WEEKLY CHART PACK

EVENTS

Saul Eslake online presentation


“You are the best economic thinker in the country hands down”

Sheryle Bagwell, recently retired Senior Business Correspondent (and sometime Executive Producer),
ABC Radio National Breakfast


"I see a lot of chart packs in my line of work, but yours is about the best I have seen. It is amazingly comprehensive, covering far more of the world than any individual is entitled to cover, the charts are clear and easy to understand and they drill down into each topic in a very satisfying way.
So well done, Saul."

Alan Kohler, ABC finance presenter, founder of Eureka Report


“I continue to find your thinking invaluable - this year to my ritual weekend reading of the economist I have happily added ‘Saul’s latest’.”

Rufus Black, former Managing Partner of McKinsey’s, and currently Vice-Chancellor of the University of Tasmania


“Your chart pack is amazing - and thanks for offering to add me to the mailing list, that would be great to be included. Everything you could want to know is there - and the way the data are organised and presented to tell the stories makes it so easy to follow.”

Prof Jeff Borland, Truby Williams Professor of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Website


“An excellent summary. Although I take a great interest in what’s happening with COVID-19 day by day In Australia and Internationally, I always find your weekly summary a very interesting review of the past week.”

retired former Chief Executive Officer of a District Hospital Service in New South Wales


“Just want to congratulate you Saul on the unbelievably good set of slides you just presented, possibly the best I have ever seen. You have set the bar very high.”

Dr Joe Flood, Adjunct Fellow, RMIT University, Pandemicia


“Thank you very much for your excellent presentation for the Economic Society today. It is always a great pleasure to hear your eloquent, up-to-date and comprehensive talks.”

Andrew Trembath, economist, Victorian and Australian Government agencies


online events @ saul-eslake.com


NOV

9th

Saul Eslake’s Webinar: China’s economic growth path

6:00 PM AEST Australian Eastern Standard Time
3:00 pm Hong Kong | 2:00 pm Jakarta | 8:00 am CET | 7:00 am London
Cost: $24.99 ~ Includes access to Saul's presentation slides and video

In this webinar Saul will look at the longer-term, structural factors behind the on-going slowdown in China’s economic growth rate, and the more recent changes in the policy and regulatory environment which are likely to re-inforce the impact of those longer-term factors.

Join Saul from anywhere in the world.

Register NOW


Request Speaking Engagement

WHAT'S NEW

Most Recent Articles, Talks and Presentations


Coronavirus Impact Chart Pack 2021-10-23

Chart Pack | 23rd October 2021

‘The Next Big Risk: Insights on the Economic and Financial Outlook
The Australian Economy | 28th October 2021

Inflation in Australia
News, The Australian Economy | 27th October 2021

‘Stagflation’
News, The Australian Economy | 27th October 2021

A few quick thoughts about China
Asian Economies | 19th October 2021

A chat with Alan Kohler
Economic Video, Publications | 19th October 2021

Talk to the annual Australia-Indonesia Business Summit
Asian Economies, Economic Video | 18th October 2021

September employment data show ‘effective’ unemployment rate at 10.6%
News, The Australian Economy | 14th October 2021

Australia’s housing affordability crisis
Australian Society and Politics, Housing, News | 13th October 2021

How serious is the inflation threat
The Global Economy | 7th October 2021

Social Policy in the post-Covid World
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, Housing, News | 4th October 2021

Fiscal Policy and Public Debt
Economic Policies, Economic Video | 2nd October 2021

Video and Presentation Slides: Fiscal Policy and Public Debt
Economic Policies | 29th September 2021

COVID provides real life experiment on house prices
Housing, Recent Media Interview | 28th September 2021

The “corrupt bargain” imposed by the Morrison Government
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, Recent Media Interview, Tasmania | 28th September 2021

Interview with ABC Radio Hobart’s Leon Compton
News, Recent Media Interview, Tasmania | 20th September 2021

Old wine in new bottles: more ‘rent-seeking’ from South Australian manufacturing interests
Economic Policies, Publications, The Australian Economy | 17th September 2021

The ‘corrupt bargain’ underpinning WA’s budget surpluses
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, Taxation | 16th September 2021

Housing Grants: more harm than good
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, Housing, News, Recent Media Interview, The Australian Economy | 15th September 2021

VIDEO

Recent Presentations


The Impact of Covid-19 series

These videos are available to audience of Saul’s presentations as soon as they are uploaded and will be available to public one month after the presentation date.

See more


TESTIMONIALS

What Others Say


“You are one of the best at what you do in the world”
Gail Fosler, Chief Economist, The Conference Board, New York, December 2002

“I have never known an economist to have such a knowledge of world economic facts and to be able to bring to bear so much information in answering a question without notice”
Charles Goode, Chairman, ANZ Bank, July 2009

“Saul Eslake is … a highly regarded independent economist with the highest degree of integrity"
John Durie, Columnist, The Australian, July 2009

“… one of the few people in this world who can have so many oranges up in the air at the same time but still manage to catch them"
Andrew Clark, journalist, Australian Financial Review, November 2008

Read more

LINKS

Useful Links